Be the first to complete today's dilemma.
Schrödinger's cat purrsA public figure you've long admired is accused of serious wrongdoing. The allegations are credible but not yet proven in court.
You've followed their work for years. Dismissing them feels like betraying what they've meant to you; defending them might mean ignoring harm to others. Your friends are divided.
If you keep supporting them, you might be standing with someone who did real harm. If you withdraw support, you might be judging before the full story is out.
Do you keep supporting them, distance yourself, or wait for more evidence before deciding?