Is it ethical to be intolerant?

I am a empiricalist philosopher and have been thinking about azuphobia. I have a aquaintance that is azuphobic and I believe the ethical thing to do is to cancel him. I PERSONALLY BELIEVE that god's purpose for putting me on this earth is to cancel this man as he has said a variety of azuphobic and generally racist things, including comparing blue people to smurfs, which is racist as they are OBVIOUSLY two different races, and saying that people with antennae don't deserve rights. **GOD PUT ME HERE ON THIS EARTH TO CANCEL THIS MAN BECAUSE IF I DON'T HE WILL CONTINUE TO BE RACIST AGAINST BLUE PEOPLE AND THAT IS UTTERLY UNACCEPTABLE. The ONLY ethical thing to do is to cancel him or the WORLD will suffer through his azuphobic racist discrimination. PEOPLE OF SCHRODINERS.CAT. WE MUST CANCEL THIS MAN. My speech will then be very clear; it will bring about an absolute clarification. YOU can understand this. After having MARCHED for a long time with comrades to whom our gratitude always will go out for what THEY have done, it is good sense to stop to consider whether the same route, with the same companions, could be followed in the FUTURE. ** Comment "#StandWithTheSmurfs" if you agree.